Professional Tax Research Solutions from the Founder of Kleinrock. tax and accounting research
Parker Tax Pro Library
Accounting News Tax Analysts professional tax research software Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn Find us on Pinterest
federal tax research
Professional Tax Software
tax and accounting
Tax Research Articles Tax Research Parker's Tax Research Articles Accounting Research CPA Client Letters Tax Research Software Client Testimonials Tax Research Software Federal Tax Research tax research


Accounting Software for Accountants, CPA, Bookeepers, and Enrolled Agents

IRS Reconsiders Gift Tax Consequences of Trust Tax Reimbursement Clauses

(Parker Tax Publishing January 2024)

The Office of Chief Counsel advised that the modification of a trust to add a tax reimbursement clause that provides the trustee the discretionary power to make distributions of income or principal from the trust in an amount sufficient to reimburse the grantor for the income tax attributable to the inclusion of the trust's income in the grantor's taxable income constitutes a taxable gift by the trust beneficiaries. The Chief Counsel's Office noted that the conclusion reached in PLR 201647001, in which the Chief Counsel's Office advised that a tax reimbursement clause did not result in a change in the beneficial interest in the trust, no longer reflects the position of the Chief Counsel's Office. CCA 202352018.

Background

The Office of Chief Counsel was asked to advise on the gift tax consequences to the beneficiaries when the trustee of an irrevocable trust, with respect to which the grantor is treated as the owner under Code Sec. 671, modifies the trust, with the beneficiaries' consent, to add a tax reimbursement clause. The tax reimbursement clause gives the trustee the discretionary power to make distributions of income or principal from the trust in an amount sufficient to reimburse the grantor for the income tax attributable to the inclusion of the trust's income in the grantor's taxable income.

The facts presented to the Office of Chief Counsel are as follows. In Year 1, A establishes and funds Trust, an irrevocable inter vivos trust, for the benefit of A's Child and Child's descendants. Trustee is the current trustee of Trust and is not related or subordinate to A within the meaning of Code Sec. 672(c). Under the governing instrument of Trust, a trustee of Trust may distribute income and principal to or for the benefit of Child in the trustee's absolute discretion. Upon Child's death, Trust's remainder is to be distributed to Child's issue, per stirpes.

Under the governing instrument of Trust, A retains a power that causes A to be the deemed owner of Trust under Code Sec. 671, and, accordingly, all items of income, deductions, and credits attributable to Trust are included in A's taxable income.

Neither state law nor the governing instrument of Trust requires or provides authority to a trustee of Trust to distribute to A amounts sufficient to satisfy A's income tax liability attributable to the inclusion of Trust's income in A's taxable income.

In Year 2, when Child has no living grandchildren or more remote descendants, Trustee petitions a state court to modify the terms of Trust. Pursuant to a state statute, Child and Child's issue consent to the modification. Later that year, a state court grants the petition and issues an order modifying Trust to provide a trustee of Trust the discretionary power to reimburse A for any income taxes A pays as a result of the inclusion of Trust's income in A's taxable income.

Applicable Law

Code Sec. 2501(a)(1) imposes a tax for each calendar year on the transfer of property by gift during the calendar year by any individual. Code Sec. 2511(a) provides that the gift tax applies whether the transfer is in trust or otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect, and whether the property is real or personal, tangible or intangible.

Reg. Sec. 25.2511-1(c)(1) provides that the gift tax applies to gifts indirectly made. Further, any transaction in which an interest in property is gratuitously passed or conferred upon another, regardless of the means or device employed, constitutes a gift subject to tax.

Reg. Sec. 25.2511-1(e) provides that if a donor transfers by gift less than their entire interest in property, the gift tax is applicable to the interest transferred. Further, if the donor's retained interest is not susceptible of measurement on the basis of generally accepted valuation principles, the gift tax is applicable to the entire value of the property subject to the gift.

Reg. Sec. 25.2511-1(g)(1) provides in relevant part that donative intent on the part of the transferor is not an essential element in the application of the gift tax to the transfer. The application of the tax is based on the objective facts of the transfer and the circumstances under which it is made, rather than on the subjective motives of the donor.

Reg. Sec. 25.2511-2(a) provides that the gift tax is not imposed upon the receipt of the property by the donee, nor is it necessarily determined by the measure of enrichment resulting to the donee from the transfer. Rather, it is a tax upon the donor's act of making the transfer. The measure of the gift is the value of the interest passing from the donor with respect to which they have relinquished their rights without full and adequate consideration in money or money's worth.

Reg. Sec. 25.2511-2(b) provides that as to any property, or part thereof or interest therein, of which the donor has so parted with dominion and control as to leave in him no power to change its disposition, whether for their own benefit or for the benefit of another, the gift is complete. If a donor transfers property to another in trust to pay the income to the donor or accumulate it in the discretion of the trustee, and the donor retains a testamentary power to appoint the remainder among the donor's descendants, no portion of the transfer is a completed gift. On the other hand, if the donor had not retained the testamentary power of appointment, but instead provided that the remainder should go to X or X's heirs, the entire transfer would be a completed gift.

Rev. Rul. 67-370 concludes that a defeasible remainder interest in trust which is subject to termination at the will of another is an interest in property within the meaning of Code Sec. 2033. The ruling notes that the fair market value of the interest would be affected by its possible divestment under general transfer tax rules for the valuation of property, but the value of that interest would not necessarily be nominal.

In Rev. Rul. 2004-64, a grantor created an irrevocable inter vivos trust for the benefit of the grantor's descendants and retained sufficient powers with respect to the trust so that the grantor is treated as the owner of the trust. In relevant part, the ruling considers two situations in which the trustee reimburses the grantor for taxes paid by the grantor that are attributable to the inclusion of all or part of the trust's income in the grantor's income. In Situation 2 of Rev.

Rul. 2004-64, the distribution reimbursing the grantor is mandated under the terms of the governing instrument. In Situation 3 of Rev. Rul. 2004-64, the governing instrument provides the trustee with the discretionary authority to make a reimbursing distribution. In both of these situations, when the trustee of the trust reimburses the grantor for the income tax paid by the grantor, the ruling concludes that the payment does not constitute a gift by the trust beneficiaries because the distribution was either mandated by the terms of the governing instrument or made pursuant to the exercise of the trustee's discretionary authority granted under the terms of the governing instrument.

In PLR 201647001, the Office of Chief Counsel concluded that the modification of a trust to add a discretionary trustee power to reimburse the grantor for the income tax paid attributable to the trust income is administrative in nature and does not result in a change of beneficial interests in the trust.

Analysis

The Chief Counsel's Office advised that, under the governing instrument of Trust, Child and Child's issue each have an interest in the trust property. According to the Chief Counsel's Office, as a result of the Year 2 modification of Trust, A acquires a beneficial interest in the trust property because A becomes entitled to discretionary distributions of income or principal from Trust in an amount sufficient to reimburse A for any taxes A pays as a result of inclusion of Trust's income in A's gross taxable income. The Chief Counsel's Office found that in substance, the modification constitutes a transfer by Child and Child's issue for the benefit of A.

The Chief Counsel's Office stated that these facts were distinguishable from the situations in Rev. Rul. 2004-64, where the original governing instrument provided for a mandatory or discretionary right to reimbursement for the grantor's payment of the income tax. Thus, the Chief Counsel's Office found that as a result of the Year 2 modification, Child and Child's issue each made a gift of a portion of their respective interest in income and/or principal. The result would be the same, the Chief Counsel's Office noted, if the modification was pursuant to a state statute that provides beneficiaries with a right to notice and a right to object to the modification and a beneficiary fails to exercise their right to object.

The Chief Counsel's Office advised that the gift from Child and Child's issue of a portion of their interests in trust should be valued in accordance with the general rule for valuing interests in property for gift tax purposes in accordance with the regulations under Code Sec. 2512 and any other relevant valuation principles under the estate and gift tax provisions of the Code.

In a footnote, the Chief Counsel's Office noted that the conclusions in PLR 201647001 no longer reflect the position of the Office of Chief Counsel.

For a discussion of tax reimbursement clauses, see Parker Taz ¶225,510.

Disclaimer: This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Parker Tax Publishing guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. Parker Tax Publishing assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein.

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com


Professional tax research

We hope you find our professional tax research articles comprehensive and informative. Parker Tax Pro Library gives you unlimited online access all of our past Biweekly Tax Bulletins, 22 volumes of expert analysis, 250 Client Letters, Bob Jennings Practice Aids, time saving election statements and our comprehensive, fully updated primary source library.

Parker Tax Research

Try Our Easy, Powerful Search Engine

A Professional Tax Research Solution that gives you instant access to 22 volumes of expert analysis and 185,000 authoritative source documents. But having access won’t help if you can’t quickly and easily find the materials that answer your questions. That’s where Parker’s search engine – and it’s uncanny knack for finding the right documents – comes into play

Things that take half a dozen steps in other products take two steps in ours. Search results come up instantly and browsing them is a cinch. So is linking from Parker’s analysis to practice aids and cited primary source documents. Parker’s powerful, user-friendly search engine ensures that you quickly find what you need every time you visit Our Tax Research Library.

Parker Tax Research Library

Dear Tax Professional,

My name is James Levey, and a few years back I founded a company named Kleinrock Publishing. I started Kleinrock out of frustration with the prohibitively high prices and difficult search engines of BNA, CCH, and RIA tax research products ... kind of reminiscent of the situation practitioners face today.

Now that Kleinrock has disappeared into CCH, prices are soaring again and ease-of-use has fallen by the wayside. The needs of smaller firms and sole practitioners are simply not being met.

To address the problem, I’ve partnered with a group of highly talented tax writers to create Parker Tax Publishing ... a company dedicated to the idea that comprehensive, authoritative tax information service can be both easy-to-use and highly affordable.

Our product, the Parker Tax Pro Library, is breathtaking in its scope. Check out the contents listing to the left to get a sense of all the valuable material you'll have access to when you subscribe.

Or better yet, take a minute to sign yourself up for a free trial, so you can experience first-hand just how easy it is to get results with the Pro Library!

Sincerely,

James Levey

Parker Tax Pro Library - An Affordable Professional Tax Research Solution. www.parkertaxpublishing.com

    ®2012-2024 Parker Tax Publishing. Use of content subject to Website Terms and Conditions.

IRS Codes and Regs
Tax Court Cases IRS guidance